FILKNET

Home | Mailing Lists [Help | Web Inter face | Policy | Archives ] | IRC Chat


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[overflow] Re: Filk "Elitism"



These messages didn't rhyme/scan so I'm forwarding them to
Overflow in the hope they'll disappear from rec.music.filk.

--Lee Gold

GEErnst wrote:
> 
> Gerry Tyra <gerry@sa-tech.com> wrote in message news:<3B1A83C1.89F168D5@sa-tech.com>...
> > GEErnst wrote:
> >
> > > > At face value, I'd say that Gandhi was in favor of the possession of
> > > > private arms by the middle class.
> > > >
> > > > Gerry
> > >
> > > At face value I'd say you know nothing about Gandhi.
> > >
> > > GEErnst
> > > http://www.potomac-inc.org/idex.html
> >
> > Interesting.  It would appear that someone is watching the boards to
> > cover their agenda.
> >
> > I would have been happier with an informed discussion of the impact and
> > implications of the 1878 Arms Act and why Gandhi would be in public
> > favor of its repeal without being in favor of private ownership of arms
> > (e.g., its impact on nationalism and Indian self image in support of
> > home rule).  Or demonstrating that the Act was considered at least
> > partially useful as its repeal by the Arms Act of 1959 left many of the
> > same constraints in place.
> >
> > Instead, I get, "You're ignorant."  On face value, agenda before
> > scholarship and honesty.
> >
> > Okay, Kay, I'm Kabonging myself.
> >
> > Gerry
> 
> Well, Oh, Great Scholar, let's see the 1878 and
> the 1959 Arms Acts so we can know what we are
> talking about and have an informed discussion.
> 
> Gandhi was a militant pacifist.  His son joined the Indian
> Army and Gandhi never spoke to his son again.  Give some
> quotations where he might be construed to give support to
> the right of the NRA's "armed citizen guerrillas" to "outflank"
> this government or any government,
> http://www.potomac-inc.org/emeerappd.html.
> 
> GEErnst
> http://www.potomac-inc.org/index.html