FILKNET

Home | Mailing Lists [Help | Web Inter face | Policy | Archives ] | IRC Chat


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[overflow] Re: Filk "Elitism"



On Thu, 10 May 2001, Sandy Tyra wrote:
> Or the combination.  Airbags are meant to be used *with* seatbelts,
> not alone.  I am considerably taller than Lee, but the shoulder belt
> goes across my neck too, if I don't fiddle with the seat position (no
> amount of fidlling would solve the problem for Lee) and I tend to push
> the shoulder strap under my arm, figuring it is better to risk a
> mastectomy than a decapitation in an accident.  the air bag would,
> hopefully, fill in the gap so that I would lose nothing.

Did a drive down to NYC this past weekend with a friend.  I'm 5'3", she's
5' even, we're both somewhat buxom.  If I take my bra off to drive, the
seat belt will stay nicely between my breasts.  If I leave it on, the
seat belt tends to slide up and hit me in the neck.  (See, bras are
designed to make two separate entities into one shelf united by
elasticized fabric... anyway...)  I've never been able to make the seat
belt stay down below both breasts.

Regarding airbags, I was in a front-end collision in late November, and I
was wearing both the motorized shoulder belt and the separate lap belt.
The major injury was the fact that my left breast turned almost entirely
purple (bruising) and stayed that way for a remarkably long time, though
the coverage of the bruise did diminish over time.  However, considering
that I *was* thrown forward and had minor neck pain (which went away
reasonably quickly), I'm not convinced that I would have been less injured
without the airbag.  In fact, I'm fairly certain that I would have had
serious neck injury.


--Rachel

-- 
R. S. Silverman
http://www.gingicat.org
"It isn't my fault that I'm supposed to be living in a musical and got
stuck in a dramatic production." --Robert Cooke, on rec.music.filk