Home | Mailing Lists [Help | Web Inter face | Policy | Archives ] | IRC Chat
Martin Julian DeMello wrote: > > As someday it may happen that my patience should be tried > I've got a little list, I've got a little list > I can open with a stroke, and simply drop a name inside > And it ceases to exist, it ceases to exist I'd change that first line to Since it happens every now and then my patience is sore-tried since otherwise it sounds as if the singer's patience has never been tried before, until we found out the kill list is already set up. > > There's the petty little pedants who correct my every slip > The dolts who talk of netiquette - I've had it with their lip > The self-appointed topic cops, and those who pay 'em heed > The person who inquires if there's *anyone* I read > And people who make snide remarks about the posts I've missed > They oughtn't to exist - they oughtn't to exist > > He'll add them to the list (he'll add them to the list) > And they simply won't exist, they simply won't exist > > Then the people who complain that public plonking is a crime > They must be round the twist - I'll add them to the list I've heard "round the bend" but not "round the twist". Is it new? > The irritating prats who say that flames should be in rhyme > They oughtn't to exist, they oughtn't to exist > And the sad, pathetic followers of long-outdated rules > The people who quote Godwin and a bunch of other fools I don't know who Godwin is. > All the simple-minded morons who should not be on the net > The ones who tick me off, then wonder *why* I get upset > And the jerks who know they bother me, but none the less persist "nonetheless" is one word > They oughtn't to exist - they just should not exist > > He'll put 'em on the list - he'll put 'em on the list > And they'll none of them exist - they simply won't exist. pedanticly, --Lee Gold